Comments: Women bishops and the recognition of Orders

Indeed, what are we meant to take "maintaining communion" to mean?

The "do we remain in communion" question is also highly relevant to the Church of Ireland, who are committed by the "Preamble and Declaration" (the unchangeable bit of their constitution) to maintaining communion with the C of E.

Perhaps maintaining communion is a directional thing - C of I maintains communion with C of E but not vice versa... Aargh. No.

Posted by Richard at Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 3:12pm BST

This is all wonderful stuff. Without anyone currently doing anything, all our chickens are coming home to roost. The C of E is looking ridiculous yet again - and no one has mentioned gay marriage or sexual orientation.

I am glad that I am not an archbishop!

I hope someone sorts this out before we get round to asking questions at General Synod.

Posted by Susan Cooper at Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 3:24pm BST

"This is significant, because the permission of the Archbishops of Canterbury and York is not required for such ministers to be invited to exercise the ministry of their orders in England …"

Hmmm.... This is an interesting point. I'm not ecclesiastically knowledgeable, so forgive my ignorance.

Does this mean that a parish or diocese located in an area currently "lead" by an anti-woman (misogynistic?) bishop could request alternative oversight from a woman Bishop ordained in the CofI or CofS?

Does this mean that when progressive and women supportive parishes in England get tired of the misogynistic falderal they can simply go their separate ways in peace and justice?

Does this mean that a collection of women Bishops and/or women supportive bishops could consecrate an alternative bishop in some area of England (much as some African Bishops have claimed to have done in the US)?

Does this over-rule the current (not very consistently enforced) rules about women bishops wearing their mitres (sp?) in England when invited to preach?

Posted by bookguybaltmd at Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 8:42pm BST

And what happens if the presiding bishop at the consecration is a woman..who says the actual words?

No wonder Mark lawrence did not want episcopal ordination from Bishop Jefferts Schori. She was foolish enough to grant him his wish.

Within a year he had declared UDI.

Posted by Robert ian williams at Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 9:59pm BST

Surely this is so much nonsense, The CofE has already fully accepted the ordination of female bishops in theory, and is supposedly only now talking about how it is to be done.

Once you accept that female bishops are legitimate -- as the CofE as a church has done, despite reservations from some groups within it -- how can the involvement of a woman bishop in any of the ways mentioned so far be thought to impair communion.

We leave aside the fact that at the present rate, if not having actual women bishops preserves the CofE intact in perfection, there's a whole lot of the world with which it's no longer in ful communion -- South India now. Not to mention other churches like some of those in Africa which have accepted the possibility but have not as yet actually ordained one.

Actually, at the current rate, if the comments made so far are valid, a cynic might conclude that the CofE is soon going to be in communion only with itself, given the speed with which it appear to be moving on this issue.


Posted by John Holding at Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 11:08pm BST

Robert. You've no need to worry about all of this. I can't imagine Pope Francis is going to allow you a woman bishop in the Welsh Catholic Church anytime in the near future!

And as for the future of the hegemony of the Church of England in the world-wide Anglican Communion? Unless it pulls its ecclesiastical socks up over the issue of Women Bishops, it may find itself on the outer with more than the GAFCON Provinces.

Posted by Father Ron Smith at Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 12:15am BST

"a cynic might conclude that the CofE is soon going to be in communion only with itself"

Ever since the institution of the PEV scheme the CoE has not been fully in communion with itself.

Posted by Erika Baker at Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 9:07am BST

bookguybaltmd: `...request alternative oversight from a woman Bishop ordained in the CofI or CofS?'

That would be hard, since the CoS doesn't have bishops.

Posted by Tim at Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 9:34am BST

Of course. You are obviously right. CoS is Presby, right? So confusing. ECofS is what I should have said. But then, of course, the rest of the question stands, eh?

Posted by bookguybaltmd at Thursday, 26 September 2013 at 6:44pm BST

'The CofE has already fully accepted the ordination of female bishops in theory.'

Let's campaign to change the present situation, but let's not whitewash it.

At the moment the CofE has refused to ordain women bishops. Much as we might wish matters were otherwise, there is no 'acceptance' yet.

Posted by Jeremy at Sunday, 29 September 2013 at 12:23am BST
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.