Comments: Rosemont reactions

"FIF/NA hopes that Fr. Moyer’s election and consecration will have no impact on their [i.e. the Primates'] deliberations"

I'm absolutely sure they hope that! Otherwise it might be taken as an utter lack of respect on FIF/NA's part for the structures of the Anglican Communion. Which of course it isn't. Is it?!

Posted by Alastair Barrett at Monday, 20 December 2004 at 6:06pm GMT

"We regret however that those responsible did not see fit to consult the bishops of Forward in Faith around the world before reaching their decision."

The *bishops of Forward in Faith*? What does _that_ mean?

Even assuming it just means the (canonical Anglican) bishops *in* Forward in Faith, it still _presumes_ that these bishops, individually or collectively, could have some kind of beyond-mere-respect-of-orders *authority* outside their individual dioceses.

The creeping _Curia_-ity of so-called "orthodox Anglicans" gets *creepier* by the day . . .

Posted by J. C. Fisher at Monday, 27 December 2004 at 5:19am GMT
Post a comment

Remember personal info?

Please note that comments are limited to 400 words. Comments that are longer than 400 words will not be approved.

Cookies are used to remember your personal information between visits to the site. This information is stored on your computer and used to refill the text boxes on your next visit. Any cookie is deleted if you select 'No'. By ticking 'Yes' you agree to this use of a cookie by this site. No third-party cookies are used, and cookies are not used for analytical, advertising, or other purposes.